IE7 May Be Illegal

23/10/2006 - 20:44 por Pe | Informe spam
IE7 does something no other piece of software has ever done in the history
of computers.

It forces the user to verify the authenticity of a completely separate
piece of software, the Operating System before it will install itself.

Now, this may seem logical from an anti piracy standpoint as a monopolist.
But ask yourself, if you would agree to validate every piece of MS software
when you installed it against every other piece of software you own
including the OS.

Given the global legal punishment that was meted out on MS for insisting
that IE "could not be separated from the OS" in its drive to kill off
competition, this is quite a randy, flirtatious thumb to the courts of the
world.

Im not sure it is even possible to prosecute against, nor defend oneself
from dependencies among software licenses which make MS again very shrewd
and also very stupid at the same time.

Add DRM to the picture and you see where MS is headed, use their tools to
do anything and you will be quite the licensee indeed.
As the Vista license clearly states, you buy a license you dont own
anything. I guess this is our future.

Its really a great indication of the direction of the industry when new
products are really just stalking horses for more legal entanglement.


http://bullardsbar.wordpress.com/20...e-illegal/

Preguntas similare

Leer las respuestas

#11 Richard Urban
23/10/2006 - 21:45 | Informe spam
Anything that Microsoft considers an addition to the operating system, over
and above what is really necessary for the operating system to operate, they
are giving only to those with legitimate operating systems installed.

Why should they keep making the illegal operating system equal to the legal
ones. There is nothing that says the must keep pace here, as Internet
Explorer operates just fine in Windows XP (illegal version).

You steal my T.V. A few months later the company sends me an improved
remote unit. Must I send it to you so that you may stay current?


Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)

Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!

"Pe" wrote in message
news:%
IE7 does something no other piece of software has ever done in the history
of computers.

It forces the user to verify the authenticity of a completely separate
piece of software, the Operating System before it will install itself.

Now, this may seem logical from an anti piracy standpoint as a monopolist.
But ask yourself, if you would agree to validate every piece of MS
software
when you installed it against every other piece of software you own
including the OS.

Given the global legal punishment that was meted out on MS for insisting
that IE "could not be separated from the OS" in its drive to kill off
competition, this is quite a randy, flirtatious thumb to the courts of the
world.

Im not sure it is even possible to prosecute against, nor defend oneself
from dependencies among software licenses which make MS again very shrewd
and also very stupid at the same time.

Add DRM to the picture and you see where MS is headed, use their tools to
do anything and you will be quite the licensee indeed.
As the Vista license clearly states, you buy a license you dont own
anything. I guess this is our future.

Its really a great indication of the direction of the industry when new
products are really just stalking horses for more legal entanglement.


http://bullardsbar.wordpress.com/20...e-illegal/



Respuesta Responder a este mensaje
#12 Richard Urban
23/10/2006 - 21:45 | Informe spam
Anything that Microsoft considers an addition to the operating system, over
and above what is really necessary for the operating system to operate, they
are giving only to those with legitimate operating systems installed.

Why should they keep making the illegal operating system equal to the legal
ones. There is nothing that says the must keep pace here, as Internet
Explorer operates just fine in Windows XP (illegal version).

You steal my T.V. A few months later the company sends me an improved
remote unit. Must I send it to you so that you may stay current?


Regards,

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)

Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!

"Pe" wrote in message
news:%
IE7 does something no other piece of software has ever done in the history
of computers.

It forces the user to verify the authenticity of a completely separate
piece of software, the Operating System before it will install itself.

Now, this may seem logical from an anti piracy standpoint as a monopolist.
But ask yourself, if you would agree to validate every piece of MS
software
when you installed it against every other piece of software you own
including the OS.

Given the global legal punishment that was meted out on MS for insisting
that IE "could not be separated from the OS" in its drive to kill off
competition, this is quite a randy, flirtatious thumb to the courts of the
world.

Im not sure it is even possible to prosecute against, nor defend oneself
from dependencies among software licenses which make MS again very shrewd
and also very stupid at the same time.

Add DRM to the picture and you see where MS is headed, use their tools to
do anything and you will be quite the licensee indeed.
As the Vista license clearly states, you buy a license you dont own
anything. I guess this is our future.

Its really a great indication of the direction of the industry when new
products are really just stalking horses for more legal entanglement.


http://bullardsbar.wordpress.com/20...e-illegal/



Respuesta Responder a este mensaje
#13 Ian
23/10/2006 - 23:19 | Informe spam
When you think about iit, acquiring a product in the manner detailed on this
page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spyglass

might be considered 'fair game' in the business world. Or then again, it
might not. Depends on your viewpoint, I guess.

But to then take that same product and use it as a means of lambasting those
who fail to pay YOU in full...

Very dangerous moral ground, I'd say!

Luke 6:42
Respuesta Responder a este mensaje
#14 caver1
23/10/2006 - 23:22 | Informe spam
DatabaseBen wrote:
put your copy of ie7 on a cd and throw it into the boston river!!!

and then use another browser in Proooottttteeeeessssstttttt !

"Pe" wrote in message
news:%
IE7 does something no other piece of software has ever done in the history
of computers.

It forces the user to verify the authenticity of a completely separate
piece of software, the Operating System before it will install itself.

Now, this may seem logical from an anti piracy standpoint as a monopolist.
But ask yourself, if you would agree to validate every piece of MS
software
when you installed it against every other piece of software you own
including the OS.

Given the global legal punishment that was meted out on MS for insisting
that IE "could not be separated from the OS" in its drive to kill off
competition, this is quite a randy, flirtatious thumb to the courts of the
world.

Im not sure it is even possible to prosecute against, nor defend oneself
from dependencies among software licenses which make MS again very shrewd
and also very stupid at the same time.

Add DRM to the picture and you see where MS is headed, use their tools to
do anything and you will be quite the licensee indeed.
As the Vista license clearly states, you buy a license you dont own
anything. I guess this is our future.

Its really a great indication of the direction of the industry when new
products are really just stalking horses for more legal entanglement.


http://bullardsbar.wordpress.com/20...e-illegal/











You mean the Charles River?
Respuesta Responder a este mensaje
#15 caver1
23/10/2006 - 23:22 | Informe spam
DatabaseBen wrote:
put your copy of ie7 on a cd and throw it into the boston river!!!

and then use another browser in Proooottttteeeeessssstttttt !

"Pe" wrote in message
news:%
IE7 does something no other piece of software has ever done in the history
of computers.

It forces the user to verify the authenticity of a completely separate
piece of software, the Operating System before it will install itself.

Now, this may seem logical from an anti piracy standpoint as a monopolist.
But ask yourself, if you would agree to validate every piece of MS
software
when you installed it against every other piece of software you own
including the OS.

Given the global legal punishment that was meted out on MS for insisting
that IE "could not be separated from the OS" in its drive to kill off
competition, this is quite a randy, flirtatious thumb to the courts of the
world.

Im not sure it is even possible to prosecute against, nor defend oneself
from dependencies among software licenses which make MS again very shrewd
and also very stupid at the same time.

Add DRM to the picture and you see where MS is headed, use their tools to
do anything and you will be quite the licensee indeed.
As the Vista license clearly states, you buy a license you dont own
anything. I guess this is our future.

Its really a great indication of the direction of the industry when new
products are really just stalking horses for more legal entanglement.


http://bullardsbar.wordpress.com/20...e-illegal/











You mean the Charles River?
Respuesta Responder a este mensaje
Ads by Google
Help Hacer una preguntaSiguiente AnteriorRespuesta Tengo una respuesta
Search Busqueda sugerida